Health Canada/Provinces Goof 4. Deny the Existence of Natural Immunity
Maybe the first time in 100 million years?
The Medical Elites are still downplaying the benefit of natural immunity to SARS COVID-19 - and claiming that it is better to supplement the natural immunity with a vaccine to the wild-type virus. How can that make sense?
This, I must say, is the oddest argument that I have seen. Up until recently the message from the elites and MSM was we did not know if natural immunity would develop, and even if it did, how long it might last. As I have said before they had complete tunnel vision and were all in on the mRNA drugs.
Denial of natural immunity. Our immune system has been fine-tuned over hundreds of millions of years and arrogant scientists think they can outdo this with an mRNA drug developed in 1 year that induces the formation of an antibody to a small portion of the spike protein. Really?
There is now a wealth of data showing that natural immunity lasts for 2 years, and given the 1918 flu immune responses, likely far longer than that. The response of our medical elites: “these are not the drones you are looking for.” They ignore natural immunity altogether and they still recommend the administration of vaccines to augment the response (again to the wild-type variant which is no longer in circulation, sure there is likely some overlap but it is not the same) - this is absolutely not based on any strong RCT evidence. They are just making BS up.
Viruses behave in a clever manner - while I cannot know this, I suspect viruses will survive long after human have gone extinct. Viruses evolve with the resultant natural emergence of immune escape mutants. This is also seen with other viruses and is not unique to our current situation. Not only that but it is possible that the mRNA drugs is due to pressure on the viral ecosystem which results in the evolution of any number of variants. These could be more transmissible (like the Omicron variants) or be associated with worse outcomes (like the various Delta variants). No one knows the future but new variants of concern would not be a shocker.
Bottom Line: There is no doubt that COVID infection-induced immunity provides future protection. It will not be perfect as immune evasion will occur to natural immunity and the mRNA drugs.
Despite this our medical elites continue to ignore the potential value of infection-induced or natural immunity. I have even heard statements that some think it is too ‘dangerous’ or even ‘reckless’ to allow oneself to become infected with COVID - after all something bad could happen. Really? Do they really think it is reckless for a 10 year old to get COVID with a trivial risk to their long-term health for the chance of possible life long-immunity (and with some cross-protection against future COVID variants) versus multiple injections (ad infinitum?) with a mRNA drug with a transient (if any) effect and no long-term track record? Even at my age I am not afraid of COVID! I will put my wager on mother nature over big Pharma any day.
I do not believe people advocating this are serious thinkers and have certainly not considered anything beyond the first order effects. They have mRNA tunnel vision. As I have said before you cannot practice medicine just based on the extremes.
What is the alternate response? Endless mRNA drug subscriptions as the ‘immunity’, such that it is, wanes over time and the duration appears to be shorter after each booster. Is that not proof that things drugs have massively underperformed? At what point is it enough?
There have been many things that are baffling about the medical response to COVID - but the continued denial of natural immunity is scandalous.